USPS:
It is with our greatest pleasure that we wish you and your family
a very happy Boxing Day! We know you may have a lot of questions for
us, so let's answer them upfront:
Q: Why would the United States Postal Service be wishing anyone
well on a holiday that is not typically celebrated in the United
States?
A: Great question! We at the USPS are looking to start a campaign
that celebrates more universal festive days. And what could be more
festive than a holiday celebrated in the United Kingdom, Australia,
and Canada?
Q: Is this merely a promotional gimmick?
A: Of course not! The USPS is dedicated to providing great
customer service and if that means acknowledging other cultures'
holidays, we're more than happy to oblige. We're also happy to remind
you of our Flat Rate boxes—if it fits, it ships!
Q: Are there any special deals that come with mailing something
on Boxing Day?
A: We cannot offer reduced rates at this time.
Q: Do your employees get this new holiday off?
A: No.
Q: Does the awful and possibly privacy-invasive service of email
celebrate Boxing Day? Or is it still the cold, heartless fad without
any concern for anything outside itself or stamps?
A: No. And yes.
See? As a firm believer in respecting other cultures, the USPS
recognizes that there is a world far outside of our typical sphere.
We want to encourage our (dwindling) customers to celebrate Boxing
Day any way they want. Might we suggest sending a package? Nothing
says “Let's celebrate the day after Christmas” like a big box of
stuff. Doesn't matter what. Doesn't matter to whom. All that matters
is that you use the United States Postal Service to ship it.
Pay-Per-View:
Two men enter! One man leaves! Thousands of men watch!
The big fight is happening, and only on Pay-Per-View! Watch as
the two heavyweight champions of the world exchange fists in the most
brutal match of the year!
Anywhere else, and this would be considered assault! Only here,
where adults are paid millions of dollars to beat the shit out of
other adults, is it totally legal! You can't get this anywhere else!
This is a once-in-a-lifetime fight and it's happening on December
26th! Celebrate the day with two men debating with their
fists, because debating with words is for pussies!
Holy shit! I just got it! I just realized why this is a big deal!
It's Boxing Day! Like, Boxing/boxing! The guys are fighting each
other, and it's on a holiday called Boxing Day! Whoa!
Whoever put this event together should get an award or something!
Or what if they didn't know?! What a crazy coincidence that would be!
Huh...
Tune in at 9!
Classical Composer Figurine Company:
The sweet, poetic sounds of Johann Sebastian Bach are timeless.
Much like Frank Sinatra and Christmas, classical music has been a
staple when it comes to Boxing Day for centuries. And what better way
to commemorate the occasion by showing someone you care with a 1/10
scale replica of a classical composer? Give your loved one a figurine
they'll cherish forever. Maybe a Beethoven? A Bach? Better yet, make
it two. Yes, two Bachs.
We'll even package your figurines and send them to you, set to
arrive the day after Christmas. Two Bachs in a box on Boxing Day?
What could be better?
Relive the beauty of Violin Sonata No. 1 in G Major with multiple
Johann dolls added to your collection. It makes perfect sense:
acknowledging the life of a German composer during a holiday
celebrated in select African countries and other random Commonwealth
states.
We're glad you chose us for such a special day. We'll get your
box of Bachs ready.
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Thursday, November 21, 2013
In My Defense, Haven't We All Thought About Pointing a Firearm At Our Girlfriend At One Time or Another?
By George Zimmerman
So, it's been a crazy week for me: I finally started Breaking Bad (not impressed so far), I stubbed my toe on a table, and—oh yeah—I allegedly pointed a shotgun at my girlfriend during an argument on Monday. You know, typical George Zimmerman stuff.
While I'm denying publicly that I ever aimed a possibly-loaded firearm at Samantha Scheibe during our little spat in which I supposedly broke her glass table and locked her out of our house, I think we can discuss privately the fact that I pretty obviously treated her like a Duck Hunting game.
However, in my defense, who hasn't done that? Is there anyone out there who would never dream of threatening their spouse or partner with a powerful weapon? If so, I want to see those hands raised. That way I can point a shotgun at the people who disagree with me, which—I can't say this enough times—is a totally sensible response.
I'm not comfortable disclosing the nature of our argument (Sam's a private person and I'm not a monster who would divulge her secrets like that), but needless to say we both got upset and I reportedly broke her glass table with the shotgun before taking aim at her. Like any reasonable person would do.
I've always hated that stupid table. Always in the way. Didn't even even compliment the sofa or anything. It was just dumped there with no forethought about where I'd be walking. So if anyone was upset about my action of smashing the table, I can't really apologize; it had it coming.
Look, we all have conflicts in our relationships. We try and be with people who challenge us and want us to be a better person. But sometimes these challenges get heated and we begin pointing guns at each other, like the civilized and levelheaded human beings we are.
I mean, if anyone knows of another way to resolve conflict, I'm all ears.
Now that I'm not allowed to own or handle any kind of firearm or ammunition, I feel a bit lost. Of course I've always felt safer knowing that I could pull out a gun at any moment and draw a bead on my fellow man. There's something called gun control in this country and I love that concept—using a gun to control a person. You don't say “no” to the barrel of a shotgun and you don't say “no” to me, George Zimmerman.
To be fair, I likely started the argument as I'm wont to do. Sam was unarmed, so the next logical step was for me to take a deadly weapon and aim it at her face.
Maybe this is the time where I should make it clear that I had no intentions of firing at my girlfriend. I was simply standing my ground and it turns out that Florida is totally cool with that. Huh, come to think of it, what was holding me back?
George Zimmerman is a-- y'know what? There's really nothing to say. Jesus…
So, it's been a crazy week for me: I finally started Breaking Bad (not impressed so far), I stubbed my toe on a table, and—oh yeah—I allegedly pointed a shotgun at my girlfriend during an argument on Monday. You know, typical George Zimmerman stuff.
While I'm denying publicly that I ever aimed a possibly-loaded firearm at Samantha Scheibe during our little spat in which I supposedly broke her glass table and locked her out of our house, I think we can discuss privately the fact that I pretty obviously treated her like a Duck Hunting game.
However, in my defense, who hasn't done that? Is there anyone out there who would never dream of threatening their spouse or partner with a powerful weapon? If so, I want to see those hands raised. That way I can point a shotgun at the people who disagree with me, which—I can't say this enough times—is a totally sensible response.
I'm not comfortable disclosing the nature of our argument (Sam's a private person and I'm not a monster who would divulge her secrets like that), but needless to say we both got upset and I reportedly broke her glass table with the shotgun before taking aim at her. Like any reasonable person would do.
I've always hated that stupid table. Always in the way. Didn't even even compliment the sofa or anything. It was just dumped there with no forethought about where I'd be walking. So if anyone was upset about my action of smashing the table, I can't really apologize; it had it coming.
Look, we all have conflicts in our relationships. We try and be with people who challenge us and want us to be a better person. But sometimes these challenges get heated and we begin pointing guns at each other, like the civilized and levelheaded human beings we are.
I mean, if anyone knows of another way to resolve conflict, I'm all ears.
Now that I'm not allowed to own or handle any kind of firearm or ammunition, I feel a bit lost. Of course I've always felt safer knowing that I could pull out a gun at any moment and draw a bead on my fellow man. There's something called gun control in this country and I love that concept—using a gun to control a person. You don't say “no” to the barrel of a shotgun and you don't say “no” to me, George Zimmerman.
To be fair, I likely started the argument as I'm wont to do. Sam was unarmed, so the next logical step was for me to take a deadly weapon and aim it at her face.
Maybe this is the time where I should make it clear that I had no intentions of firing at my girlfriend. I was simply standing my ground and it turns out that Florida is totally cool with that. Huh, come to think of it, what was holding me back?
George Zimmerman is a-- y'know what? There's really nothing to say. Jesus…
Thursday, October 24, 2013
An Open Letter to Dr. Manny about zombie culture
Dear Dr. Manny
Alvarez,
I stumbled upon your column this week, titled "America's obsession with 'TheWalking Dead' is hurting our society." After reading it several times to fully understand the point you attempt to make, I will say that every person is entitled to their opinion, and it is now clear that you believe Americans spend too much time immersed in zombie-related media, rather than expanding our minds with, as you put it, “music, education, science or the classics.” Your 435-word piece asks us to hold back on the undead mania, and I'm inclined to listen to you. After all, you're a fucking doctor.
As such, I would expect there to be any kind of study or scientific fact linked in this column—really, any citation at all. But you went a different route and I really have to applaud your lack of sources. It's bold (I'd almost say reckless) to imply that our civilization is crumbling due to our infatuation with these ghouls without a single shred of evidence, only to cap it off with “Give me a break. As a doctor and scientist, I know one thing for sure: when you're dead you're dead.” That's quite the spoonful to feed the American public; after a dozen years at universities, you can say with absolute certainty one single thing, a thing I have speculated for years: the deceased are deceased and they will stay deceased. Thank you for confirming.
Thank you also
for a quick jab at the current administration that has no basis on
the rest of the editorial. I have been telling people for years that
our government wants us focusing on zombies so they can continue
their campaign towards a more “socialized system of government,”
but I never had scientific proof until now. People thought I was
NUTS! Obama & Co. clearly don't want us “harnessing the tools
we need to enhance our lives,” like your previously mentioned music
and education, which is why our president hid behind a proposed
Turnaround Arts policy last year. I find it cowardly, really, that this administration would use our
children's futures to disguise the deplorable fact that they actually
want us watching The Walking Dead.
You do have to
excuse me while I correct you on one thing, however. You are human
(as are, I'm sure, the FoxNews.com fact-checkers), and are allowed
make a mistake or two, especially when you are attempting to engage
the American public to better themselves. In your column (I keep
saying “column” because news articles typically contain sources,
whereas opinion pieces don't necessarily need any), you claim that
“scientists at the National Institutes of Health have spent time
creating an apocalyptic how-to guide on how to deal with a zombie
outbreak.” I would like to point out that it was, in fact, the
Center for Disease Control that published this zombie guide. I would
also like to point out—and this is minor—that the guide was
actually a thinly-veiled real-life disaster preparedness manual,
letting the public know how to get themselves ready in the event that
something plausible happens, like a hurricane or terrorist attack,
but in a fun and engaging way. I would like to think that these
scientist peers of yours are familiar with your “dead is dead”
knowledge, but who can say for sure?
All right, got that out of the way. Sorry about that. I know you're a busy guy and can't be certain that EVERYTHING you publish is accurate. You obviously have other things on your mind, such as doctoring and defining what “entertainment” is. You claim that it is meant to “soothe our brains so that we can ease our minds of some of the stress from our daily lives,” which is why you say that... wait, don't you also say in the same paragraph that we should not focus on “imaginary zombie hordes” and concentrate on important... Eh, another slip. We cool, though.
Finally, I want to say that I am 110% in agreement with your stance on zombie video games. I mean, obviously a person can't feel 110% about anything because that is mathematically impossible, but a scientist such as yourself must already know that. It was a joke, haha! We're joking together! What fun!
Okay, time to get serious, because this is a serious zombie discussion. You're a doctor, after all.
You say that
“studies have shown that [violent] videogames
[sic] can sometimes condition people, especially young children, to
be apathetic towards violence. That’s why they’re labeled M for
Mature.” This was a very clever way of insinuating that all M-rated
video games have the potential to create an aggressive youth culture,
again without any statistics or specifics to back up your claim. A
ballsy move if I've ever seen one. I assume you're referring to
zombie-violent games like Resident Evil, Left 4 Dead, and Plants Vs.
Zombies, which are clearly teaching gamers how to kill each other
(and their gardens), despite a dip in the rate of violent crimesamong juveniles. We
still need to keep an eye on these gamers, though, as they can pose a
major threat to the 10% of boys and 60% of girls who don't play video
games.
So, there you have it, Dr. Alvarez. I don't hate you and I won't call you “paranoid or misinformed” because you obviously have your shit together on this topic. As a former zombie freak myself, it's taken a lot for me to “wake up and smell the coffee,”—which is a terrible cliché, but again, you're a doctor, not a writer—and I can't thank you enough for opening my eyes.
I've
gone my entire life thinking that zombies were simply a fictitious
archetype, like vampires or wizards (which are just as popular with
today's youth but are noticeably absent from your editorial), an
analogy used in popular culture to symbolize how civilizations can
devour themselves and that we are all, in a way, feeding on each
other. I have been under the impression that zombies were as much of
entertainment as anything else, but cooler. They allowed us an enemy
that was like a person, but not necessarily human. Zombies are not
gay or straight, have no ethnicity, and do not prefer one political
party over another; they are merely shambling corpses of the
once-living with only one basic instinct left intact: feast. Even
those of us less-educated than yourself know that the undead are not
real, which is why people like to participate in events like zombie
5Ks. Am I to understand that you're against people people achieving
(macabre) wish-fulfillment while exercising?
Regardless, people who like zombies, or dress up as zombies, are clearly stupid. In fact, I propose we go a step further and get rid of everything fictional! No more Batman! No more Monsters University! Halloween is cancelled, kids! Go home and study the classics instead.
So,
thank you, Manny. Thank you for letting me know with your 435-word
editorial that I'm not alone out here. These people can't see the
truth and because of it, they have been reduced to shuffling,
brainless shells of themselves. And you and I are the only ones with
a shotgun of truth to put them down.
Aim for the head, Dr. Alvarez. Aim for the head.
Much love,
Chris Slattery
(1269 words)
I stumbled upon your column this week, titled "America's obsession with 'TheWalking Dead' is hurting our society." After reading it several times to fully understand the point you attempt to make, I will say that every person is entitled to their opinion, and it is now clear that you believe Americans spend too much time immersed in zombie-related media, rather than expanding our minds with, as you put it, “music, education, science or the classics.” Your 435-word piece asks us to hold back on the undead mania, and I'm inclined to listen to you. After all, you're a fucking doctor.
As such, I would expect there to be any kind of study or scientific fact linked in this column—really, any citation at all. But you went a different route and I really have to applaud your lack of sources. It's bold (I'd almost say reckless) to imply that our civilization is crumbling due to our infatuation with these ghouls without a single shred of evidence, only to cap it off with “Give me a break. As a doctor and scientist, I know one thing for sure: when you're dead you're dead.” That's quite the spoonful to feed the American public; after a dozen years at universities, you can say with absolute certainty one single thing, a thing I have speculated for years: the deceased are deceased and they will stay deceased. Thank you for confirming.
I can finally put Nana to rest after holding onto her corpse for three years. |
You'd think they'd get better writers for their master plan... |
All right, got that out of the way. Sorry about that. I know you're a busy guy and can't be certain that EVERYTHING you publish is accurate. You obviously have other things on your mind, such as doctoring and defining what “entertainment” is. You claim that it is meant to “soothe our brains so that we can ease our minds of some of the stress from our daily lives,” which is why you say that... wait, don't you also say in the same paragraph that we should not focus on “imaginary zombie hordes” and concentrate on important... Eh, another slip. We cool, though.
Finally, I want to say that I am 110% in agreement with your stance on zombie video games. I mean, obviously a person can't feel 110% about anything because that is mathematically impossible, but a scientist such as yourself must already know that. It was a joke, haha! We're joking together! What fun!
Okay, time to get serious, because this is a serious zombie discussion. You're a doctor, after all.
Enough of this Patch Adams buffoonery! |
So, there you have it, Dr. Alvarez. I don't hate you and I won't call you “paranoid or misinformed” because you obviously have your shit together on this topic. As a former zombie freak myself, it's taken a lot for me to “wake up and smell the coffee,”—which is a terrible cliché, but again, you're a doctor, not a writer—and I can't thank you enough for opening my eyes.
I'm not proud, but I did do my own make-up. |
Regardless, people who like zombies, or dress up as zombies, are clearly stupid. In fact, I propose we go a step further and get rid of everything fictional! No more Batman! No more Monsters University! Halloween is cancelled, kids! Go home and study the classics instead.
It's probably time we tell you how Santa Claus died, too... |
Aim for the head, Dr. Alvarez. Aim for the head.
Much love,
Chris Slattery
(1269 words)
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Local psychiatric hospitals now accepting people wishing for snowy weather
MICHIGAN—Psychiatric wards and other mental health facilities everywhere in the state of Michigan are about to get a lot busier. Governor Rick Snyder signed a bill yesterday prompting a statewide admittance of citizens who claim that they can't wait for it to be cold out.
While Snyder was not available for comment, a spokesperson claimed that signing the bill “was an easy choice for the Governor.” He continued, “It was a no-brainer.”
This bill's genesis began with the publication of the DSM-5 earlier this year, which classifies the new wintery mental situation as “climate mania.”
Dr. Gregory Juniper, a professor of psychology at the University of Michigan, spoke of the recent phenomenon, saying, “In the past month, we've heard of hundreds of cases of people who actually believe that they want the temperature outside to be 30-50 degrees colder than it is right now.”
“Obviously these are the thoughts of someone very disturbed and delusional,” added Juniper.
For anyone suffering from CM, there is hope. “We offer all different kinds of treatments and sessions for the more mild cases,” Juniper said.
One such facility, The Koppen House in Detroit, has already admitted over 260 cases as of this publication. Founder Caitlin Bergeron claims that they've taken in all kinds of patients for the past 20 years but are now looking to become a specialized treatment facility. “We've had drug dependency sufferer, Cotard patients, impulse control victims, and the like. We've even had a guy who thought he was a telephone,” Bergeron said. “But there is something so fundamentally wrong with how these new patients view the world that we simply cannot take on anything else.”
Bergeron added, “I don't use this phrase lightly, but these people are fucking nuts.”
According to the DSM-5, people attributing the following symptoms may have CM:
- Irregular speech patterns, such as “I wish it were
snowing.”
- Muscle spasms, such as taking out a sweatshirt or hoodie,
looking at it, and sighing with nostalgia.
- Hearing deficiency, such as playing Christmas music outside
of the holiday season and Christmas in July.
- Recognition failure, such as seeing snowflakes in puffy
dandelions, hailstorms, or the long white beard of a man sitting at
a bus stop.
It has been reported that only five cases have been put into treatment against their will. Juniper offered a calming response, saying, “It's just so they can't hurt themselves or others. We're not exactly sure what these lunatics are capable of.”
“We are here to help these people because, frankly, no one else can help them,” Bergeron said. “They can't even help themselves. They sit at home and listen to Bon Iver and drink hot chocolate and post things on Tumblr like 'Sweater weather is better weather.' What kind of a life is that?”
There is no way to cure CM at this time, but Bergeron says that there are ways to cope with this mental illness. “We're—what—halfway through September right now? Not even halfway. If these people could just wait until late October, we'd be okay. Just give well-adjusted people at least one month of fucking autumn before we jump into the frigid abyss of Michigan winter.”
No one is exactly sure what cause CM, only that people who suffer from it are just so goddamn wrong. In a state where winter seems to last 75 percent of the year, having an extra couple weeks of summer is a beautiful thing: walking inside and outside without having to add or remove layers, not having to change shoes and socks three times a day because everything is just so fucking wet, and forgetting about the cold The Cold THE FUCKING COLD just for a little while.
“These people don't even seem to know what they are asking for,” Juniper said. “It's dirty road slush. It's consistently wet floors everywhere. It's putting on layers over layers over layers because the windchill factor in this state makes 30 degrees feel like -30 degrees. It's assholes driving 20 mph under the speed limit and then careening off into a ditch or halfway into an intersection.”
“I'm not saying that a light snowfall isn't beautiful,” Bergeron said. “And in the month of December it's fine, but then once we get into January and February, these same people who demanded this Winter Wonderland bullshit suddenly flip and conversely want it to be sunny and warm and need to go swimming in the lake. That's insane.”
“Can we save these sick, sick people?” Bergeron asked. “We don't know, but we're going to try.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)